Bovarnick 

                                                                                                                  AND ASSOCIATES LLC

     ATTORNEYS  AT LAW

 

    JUST IN CASE

    An e mail newsletter from Bovarnick & Associates                                                 Summer

 

Quick Links

 

Firm Website

 

"Ask the Attorney"

Evening Bulletin

 

I hope this summer has been relaxing, enjoyable and productive for everyone.  This has been a particularly good summer for a number of the Firm's clients.

 

Clients in the News

 

 

This section of the newsletter generally provides information as to services the Firm has provided for some of its clients.  This month we are pleased to report that two clients were awarded Best of Philly®.  They are both deserving of the accolade.

 

  • Tiffin Store was named as Best Indian Food.  Tiffin is located at 710 West Girard Avenue, Philadelphia. The website is www.tiffinstore.com.  Tiffin was also recently reviewed by Craig LaBan of the Philadelphia Inquirer; to read the review, Click here.

 

  • Zento Contemporary was named Best Sushi.  Zento is located at 138 Chestnut Street.  The website is www.zentocontemporary.com.  Zento was also recently reviewed by Craig LaBan of the Philadelphia Inquirer; to read the review, Click here.

 

·         We would be remiss if we didn't also mention Morroni Fino Toccare Custom Clothing, which was awarded Best of Philly® in 2005 for custom clothes.  The website is www.morronicustom.com.

Congratulations to all three of you!

 

Media Moments

 

 

Rob recently spoke with M.A.C.E., Management Accounting Consulting Executives, regarding legal issues faced by small businesses. 

 

 

 

What is The Legality of Rescinded Job Offers?

  AS SEEN IN ROB'S MONTHLY ARTICLE, "ASK THE ATTORNEY"

 

Question: I received a job offer, quit my old job, sold my house and moved across the country. When I arrived in Philadelphia I was told there was no job. Do I have a claim?

This question comes on the heels of last month's column regarding Pennsylvania being an "at will" employment state. To recap, the employment-at-will doctrine provides that, for an employment relationship of an indefinite term, both the employer and the employee may terminate the relationship at any time, with or without cause, so long as the termination does not violate a contract or employment-related statute. That means that an employer can discharge an employee for any reason or for no reason at all.

 

This question raises a more complicated question. What is the responsibility of a potential employer when an offer of employment is made and accepted, and the employee reasonably relies on the offer? There is a legal theory known as "promissory estoppel", which prevents one party from withdrawing a promise made to a second party if the second party has reasonably relied on the promise and acted upon it. Therefore, it seems on its face that a claim exists under the circumstances.

 

However, there are not many cases in Pennsylvania addressing this issue. In 2002, the federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that promissory estoppel is not a separate cause of action; it may be raised either as an affirmative defense or as grounds to prevent the defendant from raising a particular defense. The court went on to state that "Pennsylvania law simply does not recognize promissory estoppel as an exception to the at-will employment doctrine." However, from my perspective, that is not the end of the story. First, other states take a different view. Those states that find there to be a claim do so for a number of theories, such as the employer failing to keep its promise or violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Those courts also see a difference between the employment, which is at will, and the agreement to employ, which is a separate agreement. Those courts that agree with Pennsylvania claim that even if there is a promise, it is a promise only for an at-will relationship. Those courts ask, "How can a potential employee have greater rights than someone who actually starts the job?"  While the reasoning of those courts is sound, what should tilt the balance in favor of the employee is the issue of public policy and simple fairness.

 

While an employer can discharge an employee for any reason, most people would agree that so long as the employee is performing, he will not be discharged.

 

 

I enjoy being able to share with everyone the Firm's continuous growth and development.  Whenever you get the chance, pick up the phone or send me an email and let me know how you are as well.

 

Sincerely,

Rob

 

 

 

Bovarnick and Associates, LLC. | Two Penn Center Plaza | 1500 J.F.K. Boulevard | Suite 1310 | Philadelphia | PA | 19102